Knowledge Integrity
Epistemology
How we classify 617 topics by evidential certainty — from established mainstream consensus to knowledge that exists outside the official narrative.
By Era
Community Voting
Every published topic with a knowledge integrity classification shows a "Rate this" button in the article header. Sign in and pick where you think the topic belongs on the scale — Fake News through to Grounded.
Community votes do not automatically change a topic's classification. They surface disagreement for editorial review. If 80% of readers vote Suppressed on a Debated topic, that's a signal — not an override.
The editorial team periodically reviews topics where community votes diverge significantly from the current classification. Strong divergence can trigger a reclassification after editorial judgement.
You believe this has been widely debunked. The evidence against it is clear.
You think credible evidence is thin. Exists in niche communities, not yet substantiated.
Genuine disagreement in your view. Credible arguments on both sides — no clear winner.
You believe evidence exists but has been institutionally minimised or gatekept.
You think this is well-documented and holds up across multiple credible sources.